Comments on: L.A. Times Overlooks Serious Distortions; Corrects Only Trivial and Meaningless Errors

By: Another Drew

Another Drew — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:38:39 +0000

I’m sorry, but the Enquirer has more credibility than the LAT, and they never correct anything except after losing libel suits.

By: Out on a limb at Mike Lief.com

Out on a limb at Mike Lief.com — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:47:51 +0000

All the news that’s fit to mis-print…

Patterico skewers the L.A. Times over its refusal to issue corrections in its coverage of the U.S. attorneys firings. What’s the use of being the “paper of record” for the West Coast, when you won’t make sure that the record……

By: Gerry Shuller

Gerry Shuller — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:29:59 +0000

Nope, I still don’t love it

I’ve pretty much given up on sending corrections to the so-called ~~readers’ rep~~ at the Times. The paper will much more readily acknowledge a missplaced comma than a distortion of reality.

By: m.croche

m.croche — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:24:58 +0000

Patterico criticizes the LA Times for overlooking serious matters and correcting only trivial and meaningless errors?

The ironies, they pretty much write themselves.