The Jamil Hussein controversy is in U.S. News & World Report (at least online!), in a brief paragraph that quotes Jules Crittenden’s column on the subject.
Crittenden is a valuable ally to bloggers trying to bring issues to the attention of Big Media. You should be reading his blog daily.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Profile
Frequently Unasked Questions (FUQs)
Contributor:
Oh,
That
Liberal Media
CaliforniaRepublic.org
Linked by:
Best of the Web
The Corner
How Appealing
Hugh Hewitt
InstaPundit
Kausfiles
Power Line
The Volokh Conspiracy
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Powered by WordPress.
i don’t trust either the u.s. military or the associated press, and i don’t have enough reliable information to determine who, exactly, jamil hussein is.
“you should be reading his blog daily”
i have a fairly demanding life in “meatspace” which precludes me from reading absolutely everything in cyberspace.
Comment by assistant devil's advocate — 12/5/2006 @ 9:54 am
AP’s credibility is on the line, and the issue is being surfaced in a few more MSM outlets every day. AP’s ability to ignore it’s professional obligation to provide open and forthright verification for the Burning Six story has about run its course. It’s time for the AP to put the evidence on the table, nothing else will do.
Comment by mokus — 12/5/2006 @ 10:48 am
Right and Wong…
CENTCOM says AP’s Iraqi police source isn’t Iraqi police — Part 10 — Continued from this post….
Trackback by Bill's Bites — 12/5/2006 @ 11:02 am
Mark Tapscott has some good thoughts, too.
Comment by DRJ — 12/5/2006 @ 11:15 am
This whole situation with Jamil Hussein and the A(wt)P seems to be another case of GHBP [Green Helmet's Blue Pacifier]
Comment by jihad_for_what — 12/5/2006 @ 7:28 pm
Here’s a pretty horrifying article I saw in the Guardian today:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1962643,00.html
Difficult to believe, but apparently it’s pretty well-documented. Haven’t heard about it before. Coverup, anyone?
Comment by Russell — 12/5/2006 @ 8:01 pm
“i don’t trust either the u.s. military or the associated press”
But you trust some guy with an Iraqi area code? If he even has that.
Comment by jpm100 — 12/5/2006 @ 8:23 pm
Apologies to ADA. I misread his post. My response in not appropriate.
Comment by jpm100 — 12/5/2006 @ 8:25 pm
I hope everyone isn’t holding their breathe until the ASSociated (with terrorists) Press admits they have duped the American, no make that worlds, people for the past three years. BDS had progressed to insanity in most of the antique MSM. Conservative Bloggers will feret out the liars. Liberal bloggers are hiding under their rocks.
Comment by Scrapiron — 12/5/2006 @ 10:53 pm
Scoop! Time’s 2006 Man-of-the-Year, days ahead of…
It took a single, surreptitous email from my mole to preempt one of the media’s most anticipated events. Yes, Time Magazine’s Man-of-the-Year is none other than……
Trackback by Doug Ross @ Journal — 12/10/2006 @ 10:43 am