There is a new post from Beldar.
I was very concerned about him in recent months, and sent him numerous e-mails, even going so far as to leave a phone message for him at work.
I never got any response. I feared the worst.
I’m thrilled to see he’s doing okay, and at least thinking about blogging again.
UPDATE: And another post! I’m highlighting it in a new post but it’s also worth an update.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
Powered by WordPress.
whoo hoo! yippee! Thanks Patterico for noting this!
kimsch (127da6) — 11/24/2006 @ 6:08 pmI was worried, too, given his health-related posts shortly before he stopped blogging. I sent emails and tried to come up with an excuse to call, so this is welcome news.
DRJ (0df497) — 11/24/2006 @ 7:24 pmThat’s good news, maybe he came come out with more high-quality posts like this one. (For those who need a reference, this is satire).
TLB (05c6a0) — 11/24/2006 @ 8:06 pmAh! I’m glad he’s back.
I’d given up checking months ago. Thanks for your perseverance, Patterico.
Darleen (03346c) — 11/24/2006 @ 9:46 pmNo need for perseverance. He’s in my top list of RSS feeds and always will be.
Patterico (de0616) — 11/24/2006 @ 9:50 pmThanks for the tip. He was one of the first bloggers I ever read, the conduit by which I arrived here at Patterico, and was extremely gracious and helpful when I contacted him for help with a law school assignment. I’ve missed his writing. Glad to see he’s back.
bench (719cc0) — 11/25/2006 @ 12:24 amLike the Anchoress, still trying to defend the indefensible Harriet Miers nomination.
Yes, the Miers nomination contributed mightily to to sagging GOP fortunes. But it was because she was a nespotic, unqualified pick apt to become another Souter. Afterwards, it was difficult for many of us to ever fully trust Bush again.
NCC (a90377) — 11/25/2006 @ 5:04 am