More on Greg Mitchell
Allah has more on the weaselly Editor & Publisher editor-in-chief, and his attempts to whitewash history.
P.S. By the way, I had the rare privilege of meeting Allah last night. He is every bit as even-tempered, intelligent, and interesting as I’d been led to believe — and ladies, he’s quite good-looking to boot. And, contrary to Glenn Greenwald’s representations, he’s not the slightest bit hysterical or screeching. Neither was Karol Sheinin, who was also very pleasant and engaging. An excellent time all around.
Gay.
It was a lot of fun. Thanks for coming out (and for the kind words).
Allah (0b6127) — 8/28/2006 @ 5:14 pmLol.
I always thought there was something untoward about Allah and Ace…
Oh wait did he mean that statement was gay. Oh.
Joel B. (a256da) — 8/28/2006 @ 5:29 pmAllah–if Jeff & Ace had the guts to vent, after Mary Katharine and Bethany, then why won’t you?
Dan Collins (76d7c1) — 8/28/2006 @ 6:21 pmWell, Ace didn’t Vent, but he went on TV
Dan Collins (76d7c1) — 8/28/2006 @ 6:22 pmallah and ace what else will happen besides the religion of peace forcing you at gunpoint to convert to their false religion?
krazy kagu (272de2) — 8/28/2006 @ 6:41 pmSaith Allah:
Are they actually going to ignore an accusation that the editor of the industry’s leading trade publication is rewriting his old articles on the sly in response to criticism?
Did Mitchell rewrite more than one article on the sly?
Bradley J. Fikes (f912b4) — 8/28/2006 @ 7:35 pm[…] The “quite good-looking” (per Patterico) Allah has video of the adorable Brit Hume talking about this on Special Report earlier this evening. By: Sister Toldjah in: Congress | Email this post Trackback URI for this post: http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/08/28/who-is-holding-up-the-obamacoburn-federal-budget-open-database-bill/trackback/ » […]
Sister Toldjah » Who is holding up the Obama/Coburn federal budget open database bill? (1466f5) — 8/28/2006 @ 7:57 pmJudge for yourself.
Karl (edc762) — 8/28/2006 @ 8:00 pmI can’t prove it, but I’m 99% sure he inserted two paragraphs after the fact into a column that was published last week. It’s not a grievous sin — they didn’t change the meaning of the piece, just supplemented it, and they were added the same day that it was published — but it does suggest a trend.
Allah (0b6127) — 8/28/2006 @ 8:43 pmExcellent to meet you and the Mrs. (and the kiddies were completely adorable). Next time you’re in, we’ll make sure Acey is around and have ourselves a party.
Karol (a3bc84) — 8/28/2006 @ 9:51 pmPatterico:
Dafydd ab Hugh, on the other hand, is most commonly described as a malign dwarf, whose falsetto squeals of outrage when others are praised in his presence have been known to shatter glass.
[Anonymous]
Dafydd (6e94cd) — 8/29/2006 @ 12:38 amThank you, Karl and Allah. If this unlabeled retroactive editing is being routinely done at E&P, it casts doubt on the reliability of the archives. Does E&P have an official policy on this point?
Bradley J. Fikes (f912b4) — 8/29/2006 @ 5:13 amWhat’s up with the microscopic font-size? This is cyber space. There are no size constraints!!!
Mike (5478c3) — 8/29/2006 @ 1:28 pmYou forgot to declare his martial status. 🙂
Mirra (d17ab3) — 8/30/2006 @ 7:57 pm