Comments on: More on the (Former) Anti-Terror Program http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/ Harangues that just make sense Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:56:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Patterico’s Pontifications » Direct Your Anger at the NYT and LAT, Not the WSJ, for Leaking Classified Information About a Successful Anti-Terror Program http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-49553 Patterico’s Pontifications » Direct Your Anger at the NYT and LAT, Not the WSJ, for Leaking Classified Information About a Successful Anti-Terror Program Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:05:11 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-49553 [...] It sounds to me like the Wall Street Journal, like the Washington Post, printed on-the-record reactions from government officials who knew that the N.Y. Times and L.A. Times were going to publish articles anyway — because these officials had pleaded with the editors of those papers not to print the stories, to no avail. [...] [...] It sounds to me like the Wall Street Journal, like the Washington Post, printed on-the-record reactions from government officials who knew that the N.Y. Times and L.A. Times were going to publish articles anyway — because these officials had pleaded with the editors of those papers not to print the stories, to no avail. [...]

]]> By: Common Sense Political Thought » Blog Archives » On whose side are they? http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48410 Common Sense Political Thought » Blog Archives » On whose side are they? Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:30:55 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48410 [...] (Again, thanks to Patterico!) [...] [...] (Again, thanks to Patterico!) [...]

]]> By: nk http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48278 nk Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:10:18 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48278 Patricia, Comment #3. I think so and so do several others. Just scroll down three posts to http://patterico.com/2006/06/22/4757/new-york-times-publishes-classified-details-of-legal-and-formerly-effective-anti-terrorism-program/ and read the comments. Patricia, Comment #3. I think so and so do several others. Just scroll down three posts to http://patterico.com/2006/06/22/4757/new-york-times-publishes-classified-details-of-legal-and-formerly-effective-anti-terrorism-program/ and read the comments.

]]> By: Patricia http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48275 Patricia Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:04:54 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48275 Amen, Anwyn and Patterico. For all the attorneys here: is there any criminal charges that could reasonable be brought against the Times, or any civil cause of action a civilian might bring? Amen, Anwyn and Patterico.

For all the attorneys here: is there any criminal charges that could reasonable be brought against the Times, or any civil cause of action a civilian might bring?

]]> By: Patterico’s Pontifications » New York Times Publishes Classified Details of Legal and (Formerly) Effective Anti-Terrorism Program (UPDATE: So Does LAT) http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48270 Patterico’s Pontifications » New York Times Publishes Classified Details of Legal and (Formerly) Effective Anti-Terrorism Program (UPDATE: So Does LAT) Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:52:42 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48270 [...] But not strong enough for Emperors McManus and Baquet. They did all the weighing necessary, and made the determination that you need to know. More on the outrageous nature of all of this here. [...] [...] But not strong enough for Emperors McManus and Baquet. They did all the weighing necessary, and made the determination that you need to know. More on the outrageous nature of all of this here. [...]

]]> By: Anwyn http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48264 Anwyn Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:43:46 +0000 http://patterico.com/2006/06/23/4760/more-on-the-former-anti-terror-program/#comment-48264 <i>The blunt reality here is that there is a war against the war. It is the jihad of privacy fetishists whose self-absorption knows no bounds. Pleas rooted in the well-being of our community hold no sway.</i> --Andy McCarthy via Michelle Malkin. Privacy "fetishism" is the new pacifism. And it's just as spurious and not even as theoretically admirable. The blunt reality here is that there is a war against the war. It is the jihad of privacy fetishists whose self-absorption knows no bounds. Pleas rooted in the well-being of our community hold no sway. –Andy McCarthy via Michelle Malkin.

Privacy “fetishism” is the new pacifism. And it’s just as spurious and not even as theoretically admirable.

]]>