Comments on: Still Nothing in the L.A. Times to Counter Saturday’s Misleading Article http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/ Harangues that just make sense Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:42:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Hot Air » Blog Archive » CIA Leak: A Blog Primer http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-38653 Hot Air » Blog Archive » CIA Leak: A Blog Primer Fri, 05 May 2006 12:29:17 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-38653 [...] UPDATE 6: You will be shocked to know that the L.A. Times’s coverage of the leak investigation is also missing a few relevant facts here and there. [...] [...] UPDATE 6: You will be shocked to know that the L.A. Times’s coverage of the leak investigation is also missing a few relevant facts here and there. [...]

]]> By: anna http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37664 anna Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:14:15 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37664 Let them do what they want. Let them allow the misleading story to stand. How is it possible for bloggers to nailed down this stuff with lightning speed? These non-sycophants. No other word suits them. Let them do what they want. Let them allow the misleading story to stand. How is it possible for bloggers to nailed down this stuff with lightning speed?
These non-sycophants. No other word suits them.

]]> By: Dan S http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37661 Dan S Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:29:26 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37661 Non-sycophants to THIS president, that is. :P One president's sycophant is the next's leaking weasel! Non-sycophants to THIS president, that is. :P

One president’s sycophant is the next’s leaking weasel!

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37616 Patterico Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:33:40 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37616 "Non-sycophants." Is that how you describe a top donor to the Kerry campaign? “Non-sycophants.” Is that how you describe a top donor to the Kerry campaign?

]]> By: steve http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37613 steve Tue, 25 Apr 2006 03:23:25 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37613 The purges may be just beginning: <blockquote>"The White House also has recently barraged the agency with questions about the political affiliations of some of its senior intelligence officers, according to intelligence officials." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/22/AR2006042201442.html?sub=AR</blockquote> If you clear the decks of non-sychophants, of course, future administrations will to have to replace entire bureaucracies because prior administrations had cherry-picked their own loyalists. A vicious circle. The purges may be just beginning:

“The White House also has recently barraged the agency with questions about the political affiliations of some of its senior intelligence officers, according to intelligence officials.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/22/AR2006042201442.html?sub=AR

If you clear the decks of non-sychophants, of course, future administrations will to have to replace entire bureaucracies because prior administrations had cherry-picked their own loyalists. A vicious circle.

]]> By: Patricia http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37595 Patricia Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:55:03 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37595 I notice that 60 MInutes last night decided to air another rebuttal by Clueless Joe Wilson about Bush's famous 16 words. Any mention of Mary McCarthy was notable by its absence. I am sure we will never see the whole story there, or anywhere except maybe Fox. I only wish the Justice Dept. would charge her criminally. She will never talk until then. I notice that 60 MInutes last night decided to air another rebuttal by Clueless Joe Wilson about Bush’s famous 16 words. Any mention of Mary McCarthy was notable by its absence. I am sure we will never see the whole story there, or anywhere except maybe Fox. I only wish the Justice Dept. would charge her criminally. She will never talk until then.

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37589 Patterico Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:41:59 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37589 You must have missed the post at the top of my blog, where I already announced this. You must have missed the post at the top of my blog, where I already announced this.

]]> By: Rightwingsparkle http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37588 Rightwingsparkle Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:38:38 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37588 Patterico, I looked for an e-mail here and couldn't find it. Am I just missing it? Anyway, my first posts are up The Houston's Chronicle online paper! <a href="http://blogs.chron.com/texassparkle/" rel="nofollow">Here I am!</a> I am <a href="http://blogs.chron.com/texassparkle/" rel="nofollow">TexasSparkle </a>there, but I will still be <a href="http://www.rightwingsparkle.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Rightwingsparkle </a>of course! They put my intro at the bottom for some reason. I e-mailed them to change it. They had to review my first ones. Then I am on my own. One of the posts is about the Mary McCarthy thing. Thanks! Patterico,

I looked for an e-mail here and couldn’t find it. Am I just missing it?

Anyway, my first posts are up The Houston’s Chronicle online paper!

Here I am!

I am TexasSparkle there, but I will still be Rightwingsparkle of course!

They put my intro at the bottom for some reason. I e-mailed them to change it. They had to review my first ones. Then I am on my own. One of the posts is about the Mary McCarthy thing.

Thanks!

]]> By: kyle http://patterico.com/2006/04/24/still-nothing-in-the-la-times-to-counter-saturdays-misleading-article/#comment-37584 kyle Tue, 25 Apr 2006 01:00:38 +0000 http://patterico.com/?p=4495#comment-37584 The AP is now posting a story that Rand Beers, a friend of McCarthy, who is authorized to speak on her behalf, says McCarthy told him she was not the leaker to Priest. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060425/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_firing The AP is now posting a story that Rand Beers, a friend of McCarthy, who is authorized to speak on her behalf, says McCarthy told him she was not the leaker to Priest.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060425/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_firing

]]>