Wow: Paul Mirengoff Says Miers Should Withdraw
Paul Mirengoff says Miers should withdraw. He says Miers’s 1993 speech is the speech of a “liberal.” He is right.
The chorus is growing among pundits: Miers should withdraw. Unfortunately, I still think it won’t make much difference.
UPDATE: Add another voice to the chorus: the speech has caused Captain Ed to officially oppose Miers as well.


There was a time when “blog swarms” were considered part of the power of the new media.
Not so much now, eh?
Comment by Jeff G (302dff) — 10/26/2005 @ 8:19 pm
Perhaps, but I trust that the irony of your choice of words is not lost on you.
[That's very funny, and I mean it sincerely. The obvious difference, of course, is that I *name* the members of my chorus. And Paul Mirengoff is the latest *name*. (Btw, read that speech yet? Any comments?) -- Patterico]
Comment by Xrlq (428dfd) — 10/26/2005 @ 9:07 pm
I have read the speech, and quite frankly I’m not sure I understand what all the fuss is about.
Comment by Xrlq (428dfd) — 10/27/2005 @ 12:00 am
“The chorus is growing”?
Wow. We’re starting to sound like Deaniacs. Pass the orange toboggan.
What she said wasn’t a tenth what Zell Miller was saying back then, but heck, why trust anyone when you can truss them up instead?
Comment by George Turner (cd45de) — 10/27/2005 @ 12:46 am
She’s gone! Thank the Maker!
Comment by Tom Dunson (149cde) — 10/27/2005 @ 6:00 am
The best possible news. I had given up hoping she would withdraw.
Now get ready for Hewitt etal to blame everyone that had any question at all for her having to withdraw.
Comment by Dwilkers (a1687a) — 10/27/2005 @ 6:05 am
Don’t Jump!
You can climb down off that ledge now, Patrick. Harriet Miers has withdrawn her nomination for the Supreme Court.WASHINGTON – Harriet Miers withdrew her nomination to be a Supreme Court justice Thursday in the face of stiff opposition and mounting
Trackback by baldilocks (af7df9) — 10/27/2005 @ 6:21 am