<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prediction</title>
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22534</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22534</guid>
		<description>Janice Rogers Brown would be very nice. It'd be great to see Patterico's prediction come true, and watch the Democrats allow a white male conservative into the Supreme Court, and then watch them flounder as they try and find reasons to filibuster a black female.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janice Rogers Brown would be very nice. It&#8217;d be great to see Patterico&#8217;s prediction come true, and watch the Democrats allow a white male conservative into the Supreme Court, and then watch them flounder as they try and find reasons to filibuster a black female.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flap</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22524</link>
		<dc:creator>Flap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 03:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22524</guid>
		<description>The nominee will be a woman.

PO or JRB.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nominee will be a woman.</p>
<p>PO or JRB&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana R. Pico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22511</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana R. Pico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22511</guid>
		<description>So, is there a prize for the first person to guess the right answer?

I had been thinking it was going to be Edith Clement, but I've had more qualms about her recently.  I'm going out on a limb and saying Alice Batchelder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is there a prize for the first person to guess the right answer?</p>
<p>I had been thinking it was going to be Edith Clement, but I&#8217;ve had more qualms about her recently.  I&#8217;m going out on a limb and saying Alice Batchelder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22497</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22497</guid>
		<description>Note that I said "religious polygamy" - McConnell had things like the Mormon plural marriage in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that I said &#8220;religious polygamy&#8221; - McConnell had things like the Mormon plural marriage in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aphrael</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22496</link>
		<dc:creator>aphrael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22496</guid>
		<description>If the first amendment protects polygamy, then that sort of makes hash of the "legalizing gay marriage will lead to legalizing polygamy" argument. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the first amendment protects polygamy, then that sort of makes hash of the &#8220;legalizing gay marriage will lead to legalizing polygamy&#8221; argument. <img src='http://patterico.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22465</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22465</guid>
		<description>Dunno.  But I think he'd do well in the hearings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno.  But I think he&#8217;d do well in the hearings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Clam</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22458</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Clam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22458</guid>
		<description>Is America ready for a Supreme Court justice who's a goofy looking mormon who's argued that the First Amendment protects religious polygamy, is my question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is America ready for a Supreme Court justice who&#8217;s a goofy looking mormon who&#8217;s argued that the First Amendment protects religious polygamy, is my question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See-Dubya</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22456</link>
		<dc:creator>See-Dubya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patterico.com/2005/09/29/prediction-3/#comment-22456</guid>
		<description>I'm likewise guessing McConnell, and we could do a whole lot worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m likewise guessing McConnell, and we could do a whole lot worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.368 seconds -->
