9/29/2005

8 Comments

1. I’m likewise guessing McConnell, and we could do a whole lot worse.

   Comment by See-Dubya (c01825) — 9/30/2005 @ 12:18 am

2. Is America ready for a Supreme Court justice who’s a goofy looking mormon who’s argued that the First Amendment protects religious polygamy, is my question.

   Comment by Angry Clam (a7c6b1) — 9/30/2005 @ 1:20 am

3. Dunno. But I think he’d do well in the hearings.

   Comment by Patterico (4e4b70) — 9/30/2005 @ 6:04 am

4. If the first amendment protects polygamy, then that sort of makes hash of the “legalizing gay marriage will lead to legalizing polygamy” argument.

   Comment by aphrael (e0cdc9) — 9/30/2005 @ 11:21 am

5. Note that I said “religious polygamy” – McConnell had things like the Mormon plural marriage in mind.

   Comment by Angry Clam (fa7fff) — 9/30/2005 @ 11:26 am

6. So, is there a prize for the first person to guess the right answer?

   I had been thinking it was going to be Edith Clement, but I’ve had more qualms about her recently. I’m going out on a limb and saying Alice Batchelder.

   Comment by Dana R. Pico (a071ac) — 9/30/2005 @ 4:53 pm

7. The nominee will be a woman.

   PO or JRB…..

   Comment by Flap (cc77c4) — 9/30/2005 @ 8:49 pm

8. Janice Rogers Brown would be very nice. It’d be great to see Patterico’s prediction come true, and watch the Democrats allow a white male conservative into the Supreme Court, and then watch them flounder as they try and find reasons to filibuster a black female.

   Comment by Leigh (3af625) — 10/1/2005 @ 1:35 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.