More evidence supporting my recent predictions.
P.S. My office-mate went to a political function this weekend at which Sentators Durbin and Schumer spoke. My office-mate’s impression is that they are seriously considering voting for Roberts for exactly this reason — and that they are indeed considering filibustering the next nominee (though, of course, they don’t know who that will be).
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Powered by WordPress.
And then there’s todays news that reid is anti-roberts.
aphrael (e0cdc9) — 9/20/2005 @ 6:10 pmI address that here.
Sure, I may be giving these guys too much credit for being smart. But I still think Schumer votes for Roberts.
Patterico (4e4b70) — 9/20/2005 @ 9:07 pm