Grouchy Old Cripple takes a fair and balanced look at Air America. Michelle Malkin notes problems with the 9/11 Commission report. Stop the ACLU examines the hypocrisy of the ACLU. Patterico checks the facts. The Mudville Gazette shares a different…

In that article they cover the FactCheck debunk of the ad. Guess who’s wire its on? The New York Times.

My apologies to FactCheck, the book I referred to WAS NOT authored by any of them (but by another group called “Spinsanity” that claimed to be “unbiased”).

Nonetheless, as someone who does try to be intellectually honest, I was never convinced of complete unbiased coverage. My previous conclusion remains, FWIW.

I followed FactCheck quite a bit prior to the election, haven’t much since. They certainly will point out problems on both sides of the political spectrum, but at the same time a few of them wrote a book titled “All of the President’s Spin”, claiming that George W. and Karl Rove were the worst/(best) at twisting things and deceiving the public that the White House had ever seen. I still wonder how fully “non-partison” they are, vs willing to take shots at both sides to gain credibility as “unbiased” reporting so they have
more impact when they publish a book like the one attacking the President.

All that being said, I would trust what they say when it is positive for conservatives/republicans, I look harder when it is negative towards them.

Abortionheads will say, “Oh, remember how Roberts defended abortion clinic bomber terrorists back in ‘05? (or at least we talked about it in ‘05) Well, wrt abortion SCOTUS rulings, we told you so you idiots!” Years from now, nobody will remember all the tedios nuances of today’s accusations. Only the bullshit endures.

Patterico sees leftist bias in virtually everything the LA Times does. Yet again, he’s got evidence - this time that the LA Times loves quoting Factcheck.org, unless they stick up for conservatives like Roberts. A great read