NIF - yet another stunning edition of everything you don’t realize you need to know.

In the meantime, the Dems are putting all their energy into a strategy that won’t work, and a candidate that the R’s can easily to define as overly liberal.

Dems will later blame her loss on a failure to articulate their message clearly.

Senatrix Clinton is the 9th most liberal member of the Senate? Throwing out the 55 Republicans, that puts her 9th among 45, to the left, certainly, but not the furthest left.

9th of 45? That’s the most liberal quintile. Dana R. Pico, that means she is in the most liberal 20%. That’s the furthest left.

Even with that, I look at those voting anaylses, taking snapshots of a few votes, with more than a grain of salt. The fact that the three left-wing groups all came up with a different score for her demonstrates that the scoring system is different, based on who is making up the scorecard.

I know that this won’t please all of the readers here, and some will question whether the website I run really is conservative: What if she really isn’t a flaming liberal? But I believe that to fight our political enemies, we need to know our political enemies, and it concerns me that conservatives may be making a mistake in simply assuming that she is a far-left liberal trying to deceive people.

The Los Angeles Times has a page one story today on Hillary Clinton’s efforts to be seen as a centrist:
In New York, where she is running for reelection in 2006, and in the Senate, where she is shaping her national persona, Clinton is moving to…