<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Race is &#8220;Relevant&#8221; at the Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18785</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 15:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18785</guid>
		<description>The post wants its readers to assume that criminals are black unless noted otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post wants its readers to assume that criminals are black unless noted otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThoughtsOnline</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18656</link>
		<dc:creator>ThoughtsOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Post: selective inclusion of relevant material&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess Patterico is on to something... the Post doesn't seem to be consistent about when they think facts are worth mentioning in an article and when they don't...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Post: selective inclusion of relevant material</strong></p>
<p>I guess Patterico is on to something&#8230; the Post doesn&#8217;t seem to be consistent about when they think facts are worth mentioning in an article and when they don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veeshir</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18634</link>
		<dc:creator>Veeshir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 10:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18634</guid>
		<description>At least they're not looking for two white men in a white van.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least they&#8217;re not looking for two white men in a white van.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: directorblue</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18622</link>
		<dc:creator>directorblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 00:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18622</guid>
		<description>Counting on the Post for accurate reporting is like relying on Joe Biden to formulate an original opinion.  You're bound to be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counting on the Post for accurate reporting is like relying on Joe Biden to formulate an original opinion.  You&#8217;re bound to be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Maher</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18620</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18620</guid>
		<description>The sad fact is that, if the perps had been white, the Post probably would have included that in their story. Because then, it would've been &lt;em&gt;news&lt;/em&gt;.

If the information's not there, you can probably conclude race from the omission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sad fact is that, if the perps had been white, the Post probably would have included that in their story. Because then, it would&#8217;ve been <em>news</em>.</p>
<p>If the information&#8217;s not there, you can probably conclude race from the omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MOG</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/08/02/when-race-is-relevant-at-the-washington-post/#comment-18618</link>
		<dc:creator>MOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3407#comment-18618</guid>
		<description>And we also know that robbers and murderers always use the same vehicle during every crime ... so when four unknown colored persons approach from a blue vehicle, it can't be the same guys. 

We can only hope that at some time, this type of PC BS comes back to bite those who adamantly subscribe to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And we also know that robbers and murderers always use the same vehicle during every crime &#8230; so when four unknown colored persons approach from a blue vehicle, it can&#8217;t be the same guys. </p>
<p>We can only hope that at some time, this type of PC BS comes back to bite those who adamantly subscribe to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
