<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Post the Documents!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/#comment-17451</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 12:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3309#comment-17451</guid>
		<description>I don't know about putting a &lt;em&gt;phone book in the middle&lt;/em&gt; of these laws but I do know they stuff a lot of pork in the middle of virtually every law they pass.

Since when do most courts really care what the &lt;em&gt;legislators knew&lt;/em&gt; about the contents of any particular law. After all, "the constitution is what the court says it is", right? Works the same with all laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about putting a <em>phone book in the middle</em> of these laws but I do know they stuff a lot of pork in the middle of virtually every law they pass.</p>
<p>Since when do most courts really care what the <em>legislators knew</em> about the contents of any particular law. After all, &#8220;the constitution is what the court says it is&#8221;, right? Works the same with all laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/#comment-17440</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3309#comment-17440</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;So, if I can show that a mistaken draft of a law was presented to a legislator before he voted on it, the law is invalid?&lt;/em&gt;

Nah.  But the fiction employed by the courts when interpreting a law is that the legislators knew what each obscure provision contained, and affirmatively decided to include it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>So, if I can show that a mistaken draft of a law was presented to a legislator before he voted on it, the law is invalid?</em></p>
<p>Nah.  But the fiction employed by the courts when interpreting a law is that the legislators knew what each obscure provision contained, and affirmatively decided to include it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/#comment-17437</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3309#comment-17437</guid>
		<description>So, if I can show that a mistaken draft of a law was presented to a legislator before he voted on it, the law is invalid?  You could put a phone book in the middle of some of these laws and no one would notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if I can show that a mistaken draft of a law was presented to a legislator before he voted on it, the law is invalid?  You could put a phone book in the middle of some of these laws and no one would notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/#comment-17424</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3309#comment-17424</guid>
		<description>The story makes that point.

Of course, legislators almost never read the laws they vote on, either.  Doesn't matter; in each case, the necessary fiction is that the entire thing was read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story makes that point.</p>
<p>Of course, legislators almost never read the laws they vote on, either.  Doesn&#8217;t matter; in each case, the necessary fiction is that the entire thing was read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shredstar</title>
		<link>http://www.patterico.com/2005/07/09/post-the-documents/#comment-17423</link>
		<dc:creator>Shredstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2005 21:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patterico.com/?p=3309#comment-17423</guid>
		<description>Of the 950,000 who signed that petition, I'd be surprised if more than 5 actually read the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the 950,000 who signed that petition, I&#8217;d be surprised if more than 5 actually read the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.122 seconds -->
