Comments on: L.A. Times Sat on Evidence Relating to Clinton Pardon

By: No one questions Norman Hsu! (UPDATE: Hillary’s crisis strategy? “Obama did it too!”) | No Hillary Clinton

Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:45:32 +0000

[...] Do “Carlos Vignali” and “Marc Rich” ring any [...]

By: Joe Coleman

Joe Coleman — Tue, 06 Feb 2007 19:00:50 +0000

Serrano may be a dogged reporter, but he misses a lot. Think of him as an O’Reilly with a pen. His quest to find “the story” distorts the truth.

By: wedding speeches

wedding speeches — Fri, 26 May 2006 17:24:31 +0000

This website is a great attempt to let us know that you care.

By: Patterico’s Pontifications » Radio Appearance

Patterico’s Pontifications » Radio Appearance — Wed, 01 Jun 2005 16:35:26 +0000

[...] .m. I plan to discuss the L.A. Dog Trainer in general, and specifically the paper’s curious year-long delay in reporting the possibility th [...]

By: Anthony (Los Angeles)

Anthony (Los Angeles) — Mon, 30 May 2005 21:53:56 +0000

I’m not surprised the Times sat on the story. They’ve long been known for covering up for Democratic officials. Journalist Jill Stewart has several times written about the LA Times’ cover-up of former Governor Davis’ violent temper, and how they ignored his repeated pattern of violent verbal and physical abuse of his staff. The Times is thoroughly biased.

By: DagneyT

DagneyT — Mon, 30 May 2005 21:45:09 +0000

It’s curious that anyone can shake hands with Slick Willie without having to wipe off the slime they must receive in the exchange!

By: Blanknoone

Blanknoone — Mon, 30 May 2005 18:43:53 +0000

This is a big story. But as long as it is an LA Times bias story, it is irrelevant. Everyone already knows that, even if they won’t admit it. What makes this a big story is the Clinton angle. A drug dealer not only funded her Senate seat in exchange for the pardon, but also had access to highly sensitive documentation about his own case that could only have come from the feds. They did more than sell a pardon. They deliberately left a drug kingpin on the loose to continue the scourge of drugs. This is closer to selling nuclear secrets to China than it is to selling Marc Rich’s pardon. The fact that the Clinton loving media sat on the story is tangential to the story itself.

By: See Dubya

See Dubya — Sat, 28 May 2005 21:29:31 +0000

You know, this is just frickin’ huge. The only problem is that there’s so much stuff—the land deals, the politics, the business stuff-that it’s hard to keep it all straight.

By: Rick

Rick — Sat, 28 May 2005 20:11:52 +0000

Just a side note: Did Baby Hughey actually return the money? I remember he made a big show out of promising to return it, but I don’t remember if there was any proof that he did.