<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporting Information from a Single Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2005/05/17/reporting-information-from-a-single-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/05/17/reporting-information-from-a-single-source/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:44:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yi-Ling</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/05/17/reporting-information-from-a-single-source/comment-page-1/#comment-12986</link>
		<dc:creator>Yi-Ling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 03:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3020#comment-12986</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;certain types of allegations are so serious that they should be subject to the strict &lt;strong&gt;“two-source” rule.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;And anyone who does favor a strict application of that rule should agree that the Newsweek allegation was serious enough to require that standard. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>certain types of allegations are so serious that they should be subject to the strict <strong>“two-source” rule.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed. </p>
<blockquote><p>And anyone who does favor a strict application of that rule should agree that the Newsweek allegation was serious enough to require that standard. </p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actus</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/05/17/reporting-information-from-a-single-source/comment-page-1/#comment-12979</link>
		<dc:creator>actus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3020#comment-12979</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have argued that a media outlet should be allowed to tell its readers something that violates journalism’s “two-source” rule, if it considers the information reliable – as long as the outlet clearly informs its audience that it has no way of verifying the claim. &quot;

We can even ask the world wide web consortium to add that disclaimer to &quot;a href&quot; tag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have argued that a media outlet should be allowed to tell its readers something that violates journalism’s “two-source” rule, if it considers the information reliable – as long as the outlet clearly informs its audience that it has no way of verifying the claim. &#8221;</p>
<p>We can even ask the world wide web consortium to add that disclaimer to &#8220;a href&#8221; tag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
