Comments on: Second Federal Case Goes Nowhere http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/ Harangues that just make sense Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:44:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: actus http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/#comment-10300 actus Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:30:27 +0000 /?p=2797#comment-10300 " This is the first time the liberals have resorted to “the plain language" whittemore is a registered republican. ” This is the first time the liberals have resorted to “the plain language”

whittemore is a registered republican.

]]> By: pbswatcher http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/#comment-10299 pbswatcher Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:27:19 +0000 /?p=2797#comment-10299 "'The plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment contemplates that a person can be deprived of life so long as due process of law is provided,' Whittemore wrote." Conservatives have said that for a long time. This is the first time the liberals have resorted to "the plain language." See <a href="http://pbswatch.blogspot.com/2005/03/t-7_25.html">T + 7</a> “‘The plain language of the Fourteenth Amendment contemplates that a person can be deprived of life so long as due process of law is provided,’ Whittemore wrote.”

Conservatives have said that for a long time. This is the first time the liberals have resorted to “the plain language.” See T + 7

]]> By: Beth http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/#comment-10271 Beth Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:45:50 +0000 /?p=2797#comment-10271 Am I (and maybe actus?) the only one who thinks the Schindlers don't have the best legal representation? It seems that as the courts have consistently ruled against them, maybe they're taking the wrong approach...but then I'm no lawyer. I think it's sickening that Terri will likely die because of procedural issues. And how is it that Greer has been upheld in his order that she not be allowed attempts at spoon-feeding, even ice chips? The whole thing is an absolute travesty. ::sigh:: Am I (and maybe actus?) the only one who thinks the Schindlers don’t have the best legal representation? It seems that as the courts have consistently ruled against them, maybe they’re taking the wrong approach…but then I’m no lawyer.
I think it’s sickening that Terri will likely die because of procedural issues. And how is it that Greer has been upheld in his order that she not be allowed attempts at spoon-feeding, even ice chips? The whole thing is an absolute travesty. ::sigh::

]]> By: actus http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/#comment-10247 actus Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:30:48 +0000 /?p=2797#comment-10247 " A quick read of the opinion, which is all I have time for, reveals no obvious mistakes in logic." He does appear to turn substantive due process into procedural. Maybe it was improperly plead/argued? Maybe because ideological lawyers don't want to or aren't comfortable with or aren't conversant in substantive due process? ” A quick read of the opinion, which is all I have time for, reveals no obvious mistakes in logic.”

He does appear to turn substantive due process into procedural. Maybe it was improperly plead/argued? Maybe because ideological lawyers don’t want to or aren’t comfortable with or aren’t conversant in substantive due process?

]]> By: Patterico's Pontifications » A Legal Argument Why the Federal Courts Should Have Granted the Schiavo Injunction http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/#comment-11446 Patterico's Pontifications » A Legal Argument Why the Federal Courts Should Have Granted the Schiavo Injunction Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=2797#comment-11446 [...] ring as to claims Six through Ten. (My initial posts on Judge Whitemore’s order are <a href="http://patterico.com/2005/03/25/2797/second-federal-case-goes-nowhere/">here</a> and here.) The panel decision of the 11th Circuit affirming the de [...] [...] ring as to claims Six through Ten. (My initial posts on Judge Whitemore’s order are here and here.) The panel decision of the 11th Circuit affirming the de [...]

]]>