Read this affidavit from a neurologist who examined Terri Schiavo this month. (Via Xrlq.)
The L.A. Times strongly suggests that he’s not credible. Why? Well, you see, he may be with the Mayo Clinic — but he’s also religious.
Lucky thing Ronald Cranford, the main doctor cited in favor of Michael Schiavo’s claims, suffered from no such philosophical conflict of interest.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Disclaimer: Simpsons avatar may resemble a younger Patterico...
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Powered by WordPress.
Hey, Patrick, I’m skeptical. That so-called affidavit looks an awful lot like it was typed on a vintage 1972 IBM Selectric at an Air National Guard base in Texas.
Jeff Harrell (a5b150) — 3/24/2005 @ 11:00 pmSo Terri’s condition is now the central fact of the case.
Richard Bennett (c5751d) — 3/25/2005 @ 2:53 amAt least they got someone other than Hammesfar. “nobel prize nominee”
actus (e8ffe9) — 3/25/2005 @ 5:48 amSo Terri’s condition is now the central fact of the case.
No. I didn’t say that.
Patterico (756436) — 3/25/2005 @ 6:02 am