Comments on: L.A. Times Deception on Rehnquist’s Legacy

By: PRESTOPUNDIT

PRESTOPUNDIT — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:02:50 +0000

PATTERICO — “You don�t have to be psychic to predict that [an LA Times editorial on William Rehnquist]
is going to get a few things wrong.”…

Patterico — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:24:08 +0000

It had better still be 6-3 once his replacement is confirmed, or heads are gonna roll.

Kevin Murphy — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:22:34 +0000

I vote for ignorant deception.

As far as the Court, after Rehnquist the court is 6-2 for abortion. So, we add “innumerate” to the list.

Patterico — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:33:47 +0000

Hey, antimedia:

Where in Texas are you from? I grew up in Fort Worth.

Send me your e-mail address. patterico –AT– patterico –DOT– com . . .

antimedia — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:48:42 +0000

I’m afraid I’m less sanguine than both you distinguished gentlemen. I vote for willful deception.

Patterico — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:48:23 +0000

Tangential piece of trivia: I was there for White’s last day on the Court.

ras — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:46:20 +0000

This post bring up an interesting, and not entirely unrelated aside, given the circumstances. How best to state it … let’s play Jeopardy!

A: Whizzer White

[doo dee doo doo ♫, doo dee doo ♫]

Q: Name the last relatively conservative Supreme appointed by a Democrat.

Yes, it’s been that long.

Patterico — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:24:16 +0000

Yeah, you’re probably right. Woeful and willful.

Beldar — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:09:34 +0000

My money’s on willful ignorance, actually.