<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Rall Challenge Is Bogus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:01:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-257060</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 07:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-257060</guid>
		<description>Admit it, you are surprised he called for the death of the NEA.
My lunch break is not long enough to find the latest rall bash.  anyways, as old as this thread is, it googled up fairly prominently, thus, it is as relevant as ever.

I see the same type of comments on all these threads.  Even lefties just dismiss rall as a quack. It is automatic.  How about saying &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; you think he is a quack.  Its like you are all scarred people will take him seriously so you can&#039;t mention his name without saying he is full of shit--lest people actually go read for themselves.

What I find trully telling is that you find it more a pressing issue that the thread is 2 years old.  In the little time you had you could have dealt with the meat, but instead you wasted your time posting in a 2-year-old thread to tell me that the thread is 2-years old.

what do you think, did Osama &quot;I can&#039;t believe the towers fell&quot; Bin Landin really plan the attack on the WTC?  oh wait, that is old news right?

some issues you can choose instead:
spelling, grammar, more on age of thread, typos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admit it, you are surprised he called for the death of the NEA.<br />
My lunch break is not long enough to find the latest rall bash.  anyways, as old as this thread is, it googled up fairly prominently, thus, it is as relevant as ever.</p>
<p>I see the same type of comments on all these threads.  Even lefties just dismiss rall as a quack. It is automatic.  How about saying <i>why</i> you think he is a quack.  Its like you are all scarred people will take him seriously so you can&#8217;t mention his name without saying he is full of shit&#8211;lest people actually go read for themselves.</p>
<p>What I find trully telling is that you find it more a pressing issue that the thread is 2 years old.  In the little time you had you could have dealt with the meat, but instead you wasted your time posting in a 2-year-old thread to tell me that the thread is 2-years old.</p>
<p>what do you think, did Osama &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe the towers fell&#8221; Bin Landin really plan the attack on the WTC?  oh wait, that is old news right?</p>
<p>some issues you can choose instead:<br />
spelling, grammar, more on age of thread, typos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlitos</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-256920</link>
		<dc:creator>carlitos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-256920</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clearing that up for us Angelo.  I think it was Nostradamus (or maybe Paul Lynde) who predicted that the &quot;truth&quot; about 9/11 would be revealed in a 2-year-old Ted Rall thread.  Now it all comes together.

Angelo says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;...he has called for and end of the NEA and he takes a very rational when discussing his left of center views.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Indeed.  Google it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up for us Angelo.  I think it was Nostradamus (or maybe Paul Lynde) who predicted that the &#8220;truth&#8221; about 9/11 would be revealed in a 2-year-old Ted Rall thread.  Now it all comes together.</p>
<p>Angelo says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;he has called for and end of the NEA and he takes a very rational when discussing his left of center views.</p></blockquote>
<p>Indeed.  Google it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-256916</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-256916</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get how it is automatic that everything Rall says is bunk just &#039;cause he said it.

He accurately predicted Bush&#039;s election in 2000, he has called for and end of the NEA and he takes a very rational when discussing  his left of center views.

I know it is not easy to read a guy who says there is not a shred of evidence against Osama in the 9-11 attacks, because we are all so sure it was him.  But think for a second; the only proof I have seen is a video where he says he was surprised the towers collapsed &quot;all the way&quot;.  This &quot;admission&quot; to me seems like proof that he is not the engineer he claims to be.  google it.  He was surprised the towes collapsed !
Just &#039;cause he owned a camp where terrorists wannabes crawled under barbed wire, does not mean he planned the attack.  For God&#039;s sake, we could blame the designer of the building for saying it could resist a hit from a 707.  Afterall, he came up with the idea...
You need to look at the engineers of the attack, not the guy sitting around a fire saying &quot;hey, what if you crashed a plane into WTC.  that&#039;d be cool huh?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get how it is automatic that everything Rall says is bunk just &#8217;cause he said it.</p>
<p>He accurately predicted Bush&#8217;s election in 2000, he has called for and end of the NEA and he takes a very rational when discussing  his left of center views.</p>
<p>I know it is not easy to read a guy who says there is not a shred of evidence against Osama in the 9-11 attacks, because we are all so sure it was him.  But think for a second; the only proof I have seen is a video where he says he was surprised the towers collapsed &#8220;all the way&#8221;.  This &#8220;admission&#8221; to me seems like proof that he is not the engineer he claims to be.  google it.  He was surprised the towes collapsed !<br />
Just &#8217;cause he owned a camp where terrorists wannabes crawled under barbed wire, does not mean he planned the attack.  For God&#8217;s sake, we could blame the designer of the building for saying it could resist a hit from a 707.  Afterall, he came up with the idea&#8230;<br />
You need to look at the engineers of the attack, not the guy sitting around a fire saying &#8220;hey, what if you crashed a plane into WTC.  that&#8217;d be cool huh?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Anything</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9234</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Anything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9234</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ted Rall Grows A Spine&lt;/strong&gt;
Recently editorial comic artist and left-wing firebrand Ted Rall challenged right-leaning bloggers to prove that the left does indeed hurl a significant amount of hate at the right.  Several bloggers responded prompting this statement from Rall:

I a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ted Rall Grows A Spine</strong><br />
Recently editorial comic artist and left-wing firebrand Ted Rall challenged right-leaning bloggers to prove that the left does indeed hurl a significant amount of hate at the right.  Several bloggers responded prompting this statement from Rall:</p>
<p>I a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SPQR</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9196</link>
		<dc:creator>SPQR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 04:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9196</guid>
		<description>Josh, amusingly just about everything in your comment is false.  The myth about Cleland has long been demolished repeatedly by North Georgia Dogma.  The F102 was actually deployed to Vietnam for a period of time, and Lt. George Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam with the squadron that deployed but was turned down as not experienced enough at the time.  So all you&#039;ve done is repeat long debunked lies about George Bush.

But thanks for playing in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, amusingly just about everything in your comment is false.  The myth about Cleland has long been demolished repeatedly by North Georgia Dogma.  The F102 was actually deployed to Vietnam for a period of time, and Lt. George Bush volunteered to go to Vietnam with the squadron that deployed but was turned down as not experienced enough at the time.  So all you&#8217;ve done is repeat long debunked lies about George Bush.</p>
<p>But thanks for playing in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramblings' Journal</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramblings' Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9183</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rall issues bogus web challenge&lt;/strong&gt;
Idiot moonbat supreme Ted Rall claimed in a column last week that right-wing columnists and bloggers are more likely to post violent and vitriolic threats than those on the left-wing.Idiot Rall then invited those of us on the right to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rall issues bogus web challenge</strong><br />
Idiot moonbat supreme Ted Rall claimed in a column last week that right-wing columnists and bloggers are more likely to post violent and vitriolic threats than those on the left-wing.Idiot Rall then invited those of us on the right to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riehl World View</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9178</link>
		<dc:creator>Riehl World View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9178</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;High Loon&lt;/strong&gt;
 SeaQue City SeaQue City was a little blogging town on the right fork of the Red State River that got its name from a famous Kiowa Indian chief. Translated, SeaQue meant </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>High Loon</strong><br />
 SeaQue City SeaQue City was a little blogging town on the right fork of the Red State River that got its name from a famous Kiowa Indian chief. Translated, SeaQue meant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron's Rantblog</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9177</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron's Rantblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9177</guid>
		<description>How could you miss &lt;a href=&quot;http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=10440&quot;&gt;Kos&#039; &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;screw them&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; post?  

Search LGF for more on Kos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could you miss <a href="http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=10440">Kos&#8217; <b><i>&#8220;screw them&#8221;</i></b></a> post?  </p>
<p>Search LGF for more on Kos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coersu</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>coersu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>Ted Rall is a brilliant troll and self-promoter. He&#039;s got half the right-wing web talking about himself.

We should be taking notes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Rall is a brilliant troll and self-promoter. He&#8217;s got half the right-wing web talking about himself.</p>
<p>We should be taking notes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/25/ted-rall-challenge-is-bogus/comment-page-1/#comment-9170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2700#comment-9170</guid>
		<description>Ooops.  It was an inadvertant staff error. I have &lt;a href=&quot;http://interocitor.com/images/rwoods.jpg&quot;&gt;Photgraphic proof&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops.  It was an inadvertant staff error. I have <a href="http://interocitor.com/images/rwoods.jpg">Photgraphic proof</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
