<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Shaw on Self-Important Ranters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: furious</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8962</link>
		<dc:creator>furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8962</guid>
		<description>Speaking of &lt;a href="http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=1214"&gt;self-important ranters&lt;/a&gt;...

...does our bloghost even bother fisking Robert Scheer, or is that too much like wrestling with a pig?

Apropos of Scheer, who was it who said:  &lt;i&gt;"Every word of his is a lie, including &lt;b&gt;"and"&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;"the"&lt;/b&gt;."&lt;/i&gt;?

--furious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of <a href="http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?Entry=1214">self-important ranters</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;does our bloghost even bother fisking Robert Scheer, or is that too much like wrestling with a pig?</p>
<p>Apropos of Scheer, who was it who said:  <i>&#8220;Every word of his is a lie, including <b>&#8220;and&#8221;</b> and <b>&#8220;the&#8221;</b>.&#8221;</i>?</p>
<p>&#8211;furious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8953</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8953</guid>
		<description>Let's not get carried away.  They certainly have way more readers than *I* have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not get carried away.  They certainly have way more readers than *I* have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8952</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8952</guid>
		<description>Kevin Murphy (#1) asks an excellent question...

Gee, I wonder if Dowd or Shaw have as many readers as Patterico or Reynolds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Murphy (#1) asks an excellent question&#8230;</p>
<p>Gee, I wonder if Dowd or Shaw have as many readers as Patterico or Reynolds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antimedia</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>antimedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 03:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>Even more laughable is the fact that the editors have an &lt;em&gt;expected audience&lt;/em&gt; whereas bloggers have none.  Bloggers earn their audience by compelling writing.  The Times' editors are given their audience by their progenitors, who built their audience for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even more laughable is the fact that the editors have an <em>expected audience</em> whereas bloggers have none.  Bloggers earn their audience by compelling writing.  The Times&#8217; editors are given their audience by their progenitors, who built their audience for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>But some news opinion journalists are just self-important ranters who seem to wake up every morning convinced that the entire Free World awaits their opinions on any subject that’s popped into their heads since their last fevered opinion column.

There is no doubt that this is true. There are literally thousands of news journalists. So I’d be shocked if “some news journalists” also didn’t fit Shaw’s description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But some news opinion journalists are just self-important ranters who seem to wake up every morning convinced that the entire Free World awaits their opinions on any subject that’s popped into their heads since their last fevered opinion column.</p>
<p>There is no doubt that this is true. There are literally thousands of news journalists. So I’d be shocked if “some news journalists” also didn’t fit Shaw’s description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Stanton</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8931</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8931</guid>
		<description>It seems to me he had a specific blog in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me he had a specific blog in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veeshir</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8930</link>
		<dc:creator>Veeshir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8930</guid>
		<description>The funny part is when a favorite blogger doesn't post you see all sorts of comments all over demanding free ice cream. 
Instapundit takes an hour off and the blogosphere stops. I'm still mad at Allah for forsaking me. 

This nitwit is just jealous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny part is when a favorite blogger doesn&#8217;t post you see all sorts of comments all over demanding free ice cream.<br />
Instapundit takes an hour off and the blogosphere stops. I&#8217;m still mad at Allah for forsaking me. </p>
<p>This nitwit is just jealous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confederate Yankee</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8929</link>
		<dc:creator>Confederate Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8929</guid>
		<description>With such a huge emphasis on all-important self-esteem from the left, I would have thought that he would encourage "self-important ranters."

You aren't trying to tell me that a liberal could be a hyprocrit, are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With such a huge emphasis on all-important self-esteem from the left, I would have thought that he would encourage &#8220;self-important ranters.&#8221;</p>
<p>You aren&#8217;t trying to tell me that a liberal could be a hyprocrit, are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8928</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8928</guid>
		<description>How would Shaw rate Maureen Dowd then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would Shaw rate Maureen Dowd then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico's Pontifications &#187; Suggestion for Mainstream Media Types Who Are Feeling Threatened By Blogs</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/#comment-8990</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico's Pontifications &#187; Suggestion for Mainstream Media Types Who Are Feeling Threatened By Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2685#comment-8990</guid>
		<description>[...] 1; for &#8220;blogger&#8221; and see how the quote sounds. 	I&#8217;ll start by altering a &lt;a href="http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/2685/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/"&gt;recent quote&lt;/a&gt; from David Shaw of the L.A. Times.  I am changing one wor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1; for &#8220;blogger&#8221; and see how the quote sounds. 	I&#8217;ll start by altering a <a href="http://patterico.com/2005/02/22/2685/david-shaw-on-self-important-ranters/">recent quote</a> from David Shaw of the L.A. Times.  I am changing one wor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
