<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times Reprints Irresponsible Gossip, Endangers Lives, Leaves Out the Other Side, and Calls It a Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2005/01/18/inew-york-timesi-reprints-irresponsible-gossip-endangers-lives-leaves-out-the-other-side-and-calls-it-a-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2005/01/18/inew-york-timesi-reprints-irresponsible-gossip-endangers-lives-leaves-out-the-other-side-and-calls-it-a-day/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ladainian</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/01/18/inew-york-timesi-reprints-irresponsible-gossip-endangers-lives-leaves-out-the-other-side-and-calls-it-a-day/#comment-7978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladainian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2581#comment-7978</guid>
		<description>Although not particularly biased, the LA Times poll has a bizarre change in wording when being reported.

The poll question:
Q40. All in all, do you think the &lt;b&gt;situation&lt;/b&gt; in Iraq was worth going to war over, or not? Yes=39  No=56

Is reported as:
  "Most no longer back the &lt;b&gt;basis&lt;/b&gt; for invading".
And:
  Support for War in Iraq Hits New Low

I tend to answer questions very literally, so I'd answer no, the situation as it is today was not worth going to war over.  However, I greatly approve of the war because I trust the &lt;b&gt;situation&lt;/b&gt; will be beneficial beyond all belief 5 years from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although not particularly biased, the LA Times poll has a bizarre change in wording when being reported.</p>
<p>The poll question:<br />
Q40. All in all, do you think the <b>situation</b> in Iraq was worth going to war over, or not? Yes=39  No=56</p>
<p>Is reported as:<br />
  &#8220;Most no longer back the <b>basis</b> for invading&#8221;.<br />
And:<br />
  Support for War in Iraq Hits New Low</p>
<p>I tend to answer questions very literally, so I&#8217;d answer no, the situation as it is today was not worth going to war over.  However, I greatly approve of the war because I trust the <b>situation</b> will be beneficial beyond all belief 5 years from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/01/18/inew-york-timesi-reprints-irresponsible-gossip-endangers-lives-leaves-out-the-other-side-and-calls-it-a-day/#comment-7979</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2581#comment-7979</guid>
		<description>As you may have seen the BBC produced a piece remarkably similar to
Sarah Boxer's NY Times one but with, if anything, even less content. I
fisked it and then went on to look at the rest of the appalling BBC
Iraq "full coverage"

http://www.di2.nu/blog.htm?20050118a

Share &#038; Enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may have seen the BBC produced a piece remarkably similar to<br />
Sarah Boxer&#8217;s NY Times one but with, if anything, even less content. I<br />
fisked it and then went on to look at the rest of the appalling BBC<br />
Iraq &#8220;full coverage&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.di2.nu/blog.htm?20050118a" rel="nofollow">http://www.di2.nu/blog.htm?20050118a</a></p>
<p>Share &#038; Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2005/01/18/inew-york-timesi-reprints-irresponsible-gossip-endangers-lives-leaves-out-the-other-side-and-calls-it-a-day/#comment-7980</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=2581#comment-7980</guid>
		<description>Bravo!  Did you send a copy of this to the NYT?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo!  Did you send a copy of this to the NYT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
