Patterico’s Pontifications

11/6/2004

Revise Special Order 40

Filed under: Crime, Immigration, Terrorism — Patterico @ 3:42 pm

Michael Williams has an excellent post arguing that the LAPD should revoke Special Order 40, a longstanding policy that prevents patrol officers from taking any action against people they suspect (or know) are in the country illegally.

I understand the point of Special Order 40. Law enforcement does not want otherwise law-abiding illegal immigrants who become victims of crime to fear calling the police because of concerns about being reported to immigration enforcement officials. And in the past, some corrupt LAPD officers have abused innocent immigrants with threats of deportation. In my job, I deal often with victims of crime whom I suspect (or know) are illegal. The last thing I want is for them to think that I am going to call immigration authorities on them.

But, in light of recent evidence that Al Qaeda is recruiting local gangs composed largely of illegals, it is insanity to tell local law enforcement officers that they cannot take action against people they know to be violent gang members, because of concerns that officers might abuse that power at the margins.

I think it’s time to revise Special Order 40, in a way that warns officers that any abuses will be met with swift punishment — but that also unties their hands to deal more effectively with the violent criminals among us who happen to be in the country illegally.

3 Comments

  1. Thanks! Is it too long for a letter to the editor though? Will they publish quotes from other papers and magazines?

    Comment by Michael Williams — 11/6/2004 @ 4:32 pm

  2. I have been wondering about orders of this type for some time.

    It is my understanding that all police are sworn to enforce the constitution and, thereby, the federal laws just as they swear to enforce state and local laws.

    Anyone can understand the police must sometimes deal with more pressing problems. But these orders seem to be standing, written, directives to defy federal laws. And in some localities the police are instructed to not cooperate or even to hamper federal enforcement.

    So my question is not a position on immigration but on the law. Are police sworn to enforce federal laws? Not being an expert I can only ask.

    Comment by K. Sanderson — 11/6/2004 @ 10:52 pm

  3. And then they can not understand why we vote down their requests for more taxes. Maybe if they worried more about serious crimes we might think more higly of them, do ya think?
    They should call “W” and ask for some guts, they seem not to have any of their own.
    Rod Stanton
    Cerritos

    Comment by Rod Stanton — 11/7/2004 @ 4:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Powered by WordPress.