Comments on: L.A. Times Responds Regarding the Bob Mintz Contradictions

By: ras

ras — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

“Why is this so difficult?” you ask.

I presume that’s a rhetorical question by now?

By: steve M.

steve M. — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

>>I’ll let editors here know that if you were the editor, you would have devoted space to exploring Mintz’s background, but the story was focused on something else…

Now that was snotty.

You, who went to school and got a law degree, just got called a dummy by someone who went to school and got a journalism degree.

By: Patterico

Patterico — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Not only was it snotty, but it wasn’t what I said. I don’t care about degrees. Degrees mean nothing to me. But don’t misrepresent what I said.

Thing is, it’s much easier to argue against a strawman (”we don’t have space for lengthy discussions about . . .”) than to argue against my actual argument (”we don’t have space for a 20-word refutation of an allegation we have repeated numerous times”).

By: Sharpshooter

Sharpshooter — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Herr Gobbels would be beaming…so proud!!

By: damnum absque injuria

damnum absque injuria — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

More Non-Representation from the Dog Trainer’s “Readers” Representative
Time and time again, L.A. Dog Trainer “Reader’s” Representative Jamie Gold reminds us all who she really represents, although she doesn’t seem to be doing a very good job of representing them, either. Money quote:

I’ll let editors here know th…