<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Circular Dan Rather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Southern California Law Blog &#187; Tyranny of Copyright - Part XIX (Lies, And The Lying Liars Who Lie)</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-68638</link>
		<dc:creator>The Southern California Law Blog &#187; Tyranny of Copyright - Part XIX (Lies, And The Lying Liars Who Lie)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 05:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-68638</guid>
		<description>[...] Some may read the above mea culpa and feel that Access Copyright is acting in good faith and that their fair use omissions were an honest mistake. That is your prerogative. I don’t share that belief however. I think that they have simply been shamed too much to admit otherwise. Dan Rather was eventually shamed into admitting that the authenticity of Bush&#8217;s National Guard documents could not be verified. Would you then conclude that he was acting in good faith all along? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some may read the above mea culpa and feel that Access Copyright is acting in good faith and that their fair use omissions were an honest mistake. That is your prerogative. I don’t share that belief however. I think that they have simply been shamed too much to admit otherwise. Dan Rather was eventually shamed into admitting that the authenticity of Bush&#8217;s National Guard documents could not be verified. Would you then conclude that he was acting in good faith all along? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>"...the documents must be authentic, because they line up with what we know about Bush's National Guard record"

I guess gullibility does not preclude that they were created to enhance what some people WISHED TO BELIEVE they KNEW.

For a group that regales us emphatically and at length (not to mention at high volume) the left is sure clueless.

Hey, Dan, pull my finger!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the documents must be authentic, because they line up with what we know about Bush&#8217;s National Guard record&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess gullibility does not preclude that they were created to enhance what some people WISHED TO BELIEVE they KNEW.</p>
<p>For a group that regales us emphatically and at length (not to mention at high volume) the left is sure clueless.</p>
<p>Hey, Dan, pull my finger!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>Follow up:

Should read: For a group that regales us emphatically and at length (not to mention at high volume)of how intelligent and superior they are, the left is sure clueless.

But hey!! W is dumb and followed blindly by right-wing idiots...right Thereeeeeza?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow up:</p>
<p>Should read: For a group that regales us emphatically and at length (not to mention at high volume)of how intelligent and superior they are, the left is sure clueless.</p>
<p>But hey!! W is dumb and followed blindly by right-wing idiots&#8230;right Thereeeeeza?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>I can't believe that Time Mag and CBS stated the Bill Glennon was a Technology expert...I heard he is a Typewriter repairman?

I thought now that is their "Technology Expert" a Typewriter Repairman???

Man...that is a hoot. I can't believe Time would not realize who Bill Glennon is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that Time Mag and CBS stated the Bill Glennon was a Technology expert&#8230;I heard he is a Typewriter repairman?</p>
<p>I thought now that is their &#8220;Technology Expert&#8221; a Typewriter Repairman???</p>
<p>Man&#8230;that is a hoot. I can&#8217;t believe Time would not realize who Bill Glennon is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James C. Hess</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4425</link>
		<dc:creator>James C. Hess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4425</guid>
		<description>Watching Dan Rather implode is not the interesting part. Watching the subsequent shock wave consume John Kerry and the Dems--now that makes for interesting viewing.

I enjoy your blog, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching Dan Rather implode is not the interesting part. Watching the subsequent shock wave consume John Kerry and the Dems&#8211;now that makes for interesting viewing.</p>
<p>I enjoy your blog, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWB</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>MWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>Dan is learning that The Blogosphere Never Blinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan is learning that The Blogosphere Never Blinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4427</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4427</guid>
		<description>James C. Hess:

Thanks for the kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James C. Hess:</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Anderson</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4428</link>
		<dc:creator>John Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4428</guid>
		<description>Next &lt;i&gt;60 Minutes&lt;/i&gt; story: the &lt;i&gt;Hitler Diaries&lt;/i&gt; must be real bcause they contained references to real WWII events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next <i>60 Minutes</i> story: the <i>Hitler Diaries</i> must be real bcause they contained references to real WWII events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeldarBlog</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4429</link>
		<dc:creator>BeldarBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4429</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Besieged Gunga Dan serves up spitballs on Monday night's CBS Evening News; WaPo and NYT slam them back at high velocity!&lt;/strong&gt;
Via Ratherbiased, with the help of a sharp-eyed reader's email pointers, here's transcript of Dan Rather's latest defense on the Rathergate docs on Monday night's "CBS Evening News" broadcast. And you can watch a streaming video of the broadcast here, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Besieged Gunga Dan serves up spitballs on Monday night&#8217;s CBS Evening News; WaPo and NYT slam them back at high velocity!</strong><br />
Via Ratherbiased, with the help of a sharp-eyed reader&#8217;s email pointers, here&#8217;s transcript of Dan Rather&#8217;s latest defense on the Rathergate docs on Monday night&#8217;s &#8220;CBS Evening News&#8221; broadcast. And you can watch a streaming video of the broadcast here, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HobbsOnline</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/09/13/the-circular-dan-rather/#comment-4430</link>
		<dc:creator>HobbsOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1976#comment-4430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Memogate Roundup&lt;/strong&gt;
Lots of new good reading today regarding those CBS forged memos. Here is a Dallas Morning News editorial. Also, RatherBiased.com takes apart Dan Rather's second attempt to defend his forged-memo smearjob. Via RatherBiased.com, you also find links to va...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Memogate Roundup</strong><br />
Lots of new good reading today regarding those CBS forged memos. Here is a Dallas Morning News editorial. Also, RatherBiased.com takes apart Dan Rather&#8217;s second attempt to defend his forged-memo smearjob. Via RatherBiased.com, you also find links to va&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.063 seconds -->
