http://www.patterico.com/2004/07/26/airline-hijacking-attempts-are-still-a-concern/ Harangues that just make sense Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:36:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.patterico.com/2004/07/26/airline-hijacking-attempts-are-still-a-concern/#comment-3036 Norman Harper Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=1748#comment-3036 When in the hell is the United State going the protect its people from all the other trouble maker in the world and in our county . When in the hell is the United State going the protect its people from all the other trouble maker in the world and in our county .

]]> http://www.patterico.com/2004/07/26/airline-hijacking-attempts-are-still-a-concern/#comment-3037 Tom Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=1748#comment-3037 Patterico, there's nothing controversial about that. In fact, I don't think very many civil libertarians would have a problem with even more stringent security measures, as long as they were applied to everybody equally. <a href="http://patterico.com/archives/002483.php#2807" rel="nofollow">I know I wouldn't.</a> Patterico, there’s nothing controversial about that. In fact, I don’t think very many civil libertarians would have a problem with even more stringent security measures, as long as they were applied to everybody equally. I know I wouldn’t.

]]> http://www.patterico.com/2004/07/26/airline-hijacking-attempts-are-still-a-concern/#comment-3038 Xrlq Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 /?p=1748#comment-3038 Why should they be applied to everybody equally? Everybody doesn't pose an equal, or even comparable, risk. Why should they be applied to everybody equally? Everybody doesn’t pose an equal, or even comparable, risk.

]]>