Comments on: Initiatives Numbered . . . Start the Chant: NO ON 66! http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/ Harangues that just make sense Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:12:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Xrlq http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2543 Xrlq Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2543 Get your kicks, but NOT on Route 66. Get your kicks, but NOT on Route 66.

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2544 Patterico Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2544 Yeah, I was trying to come up with something along those lines. I think it still needs work. Yeah, I was trying to come up with something along those lines. I think it still needs work.

]]> By: Alan http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2545 Alan Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2545 Well if prop 69 had been a worthwhile measure I'd suggest the off color: No, No on 66, we would rather 69! /ducks/ Well if prop 69 had been a worthwhile measure I’d suggest the off color:

No, No on 66, we would rather 69!

/ducks/

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2546 Patterico Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2546 Mmmm . . . still needs work. Mmmm . . . still needs work.

]]> By: Xrlq http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2547 Xrlq Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2547 OK, maybe try a heavy metal approach, with a Bruce Dickinson sound-alike singing: <blockquote>Prop... 66 The number of the beast Hell-ish killers, soon to be released.</blockquote> Don't worry, I'm not quitting my day job. OK, maybe try a heavy metal approach, with a Bruce Dickinson sound-alike singing:

Prop… 66
The number of the beast
Hell-ish killers, soon to be released.

Don’t worry, I’m not quitting my day job.

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2548 Patterico Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2548 I wouldn't. But I think you're getting warmer. I wouldn’t.

But I think you’re getting warmer.

]]> By: rachel http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2549 rachel Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2549 YES YES YES YES YES YES and YYYYYYYYYYYEEEESSSS (ON prop 66!!!!!!!)......you guys don't know whats really going on in our country.Well i'll tell you, prop 66 means 3 strikes for murderes , rapists , Robberys and serious violent offences,and yes it means if somebody stills a t- shirt or piece of GUM doesn't have to go to jail for the rest of their lifes... so i say yes on prop 66 and you should too....:) YES YES YES YES YES YES and YYYYYYYYYYYEEEESSSS
(ON prop 66!!!!!!!)……you guys don’t know whats really going on in our country.Well i’ll tell you, prop 66 means 3 strikes for murderes , rapists , Robberys and serious violent offences,and yes it means if somebody stills a t- shirt or piece of GUM doesn’t have to go to jail for the rest of their lifes… so i say yes on prop 66 and you should too….:)

]]> By: shawn -- well ok really just rachel again http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2550 shawn -- well ok really just rachel again Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2550 I say yeson prop 66 because it's right!!!! I say yeson prop 66 because it’s right!!!!

]]> By: Patterico http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2551 Patterico Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2551 Shawn/Rachel: One name per IP address, mmmmkay? Shawn/Rachel:

One name per IP address, mmmmkay?

]]> By: MOG http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2552 MOG Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://patterico.com/2004/06/29/initiatives-numbered-start-the-chant-no-on-66/#comment-2552 Rachel, let's assume two people steal a pack of gum each. Defendant 'A' has a clean record, not a single conviction. Defendant 'B' has been convicted of a robbery, a residential burglary, and a rape. How much time should each defendant serve? Shouldn't defendant 'B', who has shown that he hasn't learned his lesson and continues to commit crimes, have to serve more time than one who has never committed a crime? Rachel, let’s assume two people steal a pack of gum each. Defendant ‘A’ has a clean record, not a single conviction. Defendant ‘B’ has been convicted of a robbery, a residential burglary, and a rape.

How much time should each defendant serve?

Shouldn’t defendant ‘B’, who has shown that he hasn’t learned his lesson and continues to commit crimes, have to serve more time than one who has never committed a crime?

]]>