<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dick Clarke: Liar Extraordinaire (Chapter 47)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2004/05/26/dick-clarke-liar-extraordinaire-chapter-47/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2004/05/26/dick-clarke-liar-extraordinaire-chapter-47/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Chris Wallace Has Indeed Grilled Bush Officials About Failing to Get Osama Before 9/11</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/05/26/dick-clarke-liar-extraordinaire-chapter-47/#comment-82471</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; Chris Wallace Has Indeed Grilled Bush Officials About Failing to Get Osama Before 9/11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1570#comment-82471</guid>
		<description>[...] P.P.S. Clinton today repeatedly touted Dick Clarke&#8217;s book as the final word on what really happened. In Wallace&#8217;s interview of Rumsfeld, Wallace noted &#8220;apparent contradictions in [Clarke&#8217;s] story&#8221; &#8212; an obvious thing to bring up because, indeed, there were numerous contradictions. Clarke has serious credibility issues, as I have explained before, many, many times. As these links show, Clarke has elaborated his claims of Bush&#8217;s fixation on Iraq. He has at times claimed that he approved the request for bin Laden family members to be flown out of the country, and at other times that he denied the request. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.P.S. Clinton today repeatedly touted Dick Clarke&#8217;s book as the final word on what really happened. In Wallace&#8217;s interview of Rumsfeld, Wallace noted &#8220;apparent contradictions in [Clarke&#8217;s] story&#8221; &#8212; an obvious thing to bring up because, indeed, there were numerous contradictions. Clarke has serious credibility issues, as I have explained before, many, many times. As these links show, Clarke has elaborated his claims of Bush&#8217;s fixation on Iraq. He has at times claimed that he approved the request for bin Laden family members to be flown out of the country, and at other times that he denied the request. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calblog</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/05/26/dick-clarke-liar-extraordinaire-chapter-47/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator>Calblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1570#comment-2284</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The LA Times and Their French Experts&lt;/strong&gt;
This blog will never match the depth of Patterico's LA Times examination including yesterday's entry on Rathergate and the facts omitted by the Times. However occasionally, something irks me so much that it bears mention. Today's report on Al Qaeda...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The LA Times and Their French Experts</strong><br />
This blog will never match the depth of Patterico&#8217;s LA Times examination including yesterday&#8217;s entry on Rathergate and the facts omitted by the Times. However occasionally, something irks me so much that it bears mention. Today&#8217;s report on Al Qaeda&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.034 seconds -->
