<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scalia Corrections Keep Coming at the Dog Trainer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patterico.com/2004/04/03/scalia-corrections-keep-coming-at-the-idog-traineri/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patterico.com/2004/04/03/scalia-corrections-keep-coming-at-the-idog-traineri/</link>
	<description>Harangues that just make sense</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/04/03/scalia-corrections-keep-coming-at-the-idog-traineri/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1403#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>First try received an error -- I'll try again, much shorter:

Witness recanted and died. I bet the prosecution is based primarily on witness testimony (which has been recanted). Not subject to examination (and cross exam) under oath, due to said death.

Not saying your premise is wrong -- just that this doesn't appear to be a case that supports your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First try received an error &#8212; I&#8217;ll try again, much shorter:</p>
<p>Witness recanted and died. I bet the prosecution is based primarily on witness testimony (which has been recanted). Not subject to examination (and cross exam) under oath, due to said death.</p>
<p>Not saying your premise is wrong &#8212; just that this doesn&#8217;t appear to be a case that supports your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/04/03/scalia-corrections-keep-coming-at-the-idog-traineri/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1403#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>I think you meant this comment for a different thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant this comment for a different thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrestoPundit -- Defining Liberalism for the 21st Century.</title>
		<link>http://patterico.com/2004/04/03/scalia-corrections-keep-coming-at-the-idog-traineri/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>PrestoPundit -- Defining Liberalism for the 21st Century.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1403#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LA Times readers want to know ..&lt;/strong&gt;
"Why did the original [LA Times] story [on Antonin Scalia] have so many errors that made Scalia look bad?"...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LA Times readers want to know ..</strong><br />
&#8220;Why did the original [LA Times] story [on Antonin Scalia] have so many errors that made Scalia look bad?&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
