DOG TRAINER FUMBLES THE BALL ON THE INTELLIGENCE COMMISSION
Professor Bainbridge rightly rips the Dog Trainer a new one for its inexcusable nonsense on Bush’s intelligence commission. The article states:
Some questioned why the administration picked so many members with seemingly limited experience in intelligence matters or background working in high-level national security positions.
Professor Bainbridge then proceeds to enumerate the bona fides of everyone on the commission. The further you read, the louder your chuckling will get.
Read the whole post and try not to laugh out loud at the Dog Trainer’s outrageous inaccuracy and bias.
You will be surprised to learn of a charge that the Times’ presentation of the news can extend beyond Bush-mongering, even to matters of diversity in higher education! The dubious assertion that the paper ran a skewed A.P. a report on minority admissions at U. Michigan was made by John Rosenberg, on his web-log Discriminations.
AP and the LAT are awaiting your defense of their integrity. I’m sure.
Comment by AMac — 2/11/2004 @ 6:16 am