SoCalLawyer ably leaps on Erwin Chemerinsky for his glaring error in the analysis of Rhonda Miller’s frivolous libel suit against Arnold. (Chemerinsky called Miller “clearly a private figure” when she is clearly a limited purpose public figure.) A very interesting and worthwhile post. Check it out.
UPDATE: SoCalLawyer points out that the post was actually by his sometime co-blogger Justin Levine.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Pronounced "Patter-EE-koh"
E-mail: Just use my moniker Patterico, followed by the @ symbol, followed by gmail.com
Profile
Frequently Unasked Questions (FUQs)
Contributor:
Oh,
That
Liberal Media
CaliforniaRepublic.org
Linked by:
Best of the Web
The Corner
How Appealing
Hugh Hewitt
InstaPundit
Kausfiles
Power Line
The Volokh Conspiracy
The statements made on this web site reflect the personal opinions of the author. They are not made in any official capacity, and do not represent the opinions of the author's employer.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Powered by WordPress.
Actually, it was my some-time guest blogger, Justin Levine, not me who did the post. That probably made it more “interesting and worthwhile” than my usual posts. But, thanks for the link.
Comment by So Cal Lawyer — 12/11/2003 @ 8:15 pm
At least I didn’t say: “Much more interesting than the usual crap SoCalLawyer puts out.” (Which, of course, would not be true. Your blog is consistently well-written and interesting, which is why I read it daily.)
But this was a very good post. . .
Comment by Patterico — 12/11/2003 @ 8:52 pm
Justin rocks. He consistently pulls in more readers than I do.
Comment by So Cal Lawyer — 12/12/2003 @ 7:20 am